<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here you go, Dave. We give in.</title>
	<link>http://christopherwhite.info/blog/2006/12/19/here-you-go-dave-we-give-in/</link>
	<description>"While the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power."</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David Gillies</title>
		<link>http://christopherwhite.info/blog/2006/12/19/here-you-go-dave-we-give-in/#comment-1351</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christopherwhite.info/blog/2006/12/19/here-you-go-dave-we-give-in/#comment-1351</guid>
					<description>The &lt;i&gt;New Statesman&lt;/i&gt; still cleaves to a Weltanschauung that has been demonstrated, empirically, to be bogus. What chance that argument or exposition of the facts could penetrate that? It's what the Jesuits used to call invincible ignorance. If by the time you're penning articles for supposedly serious political magazines you remain unconvinced of the merits of free trade, then you are probably irredeemable. Left or Right doesn't really enter the picture; Brad de Long, Paul Krugman, Milton Friedman and Richard Epstein all agreed that trade is most 
beneficial when as unfettered as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>New Statesman</i> still cleaves to a Weltanschauung that has been demonstrated, empirically, to be bogus. What chance that argument or exposition of the facts could penetrate that? It&#8217;s what the Jesuits used to call invincible ignorance. If by the time you&#8217;re penning articles for supposedly serious political magazines you remain unconvinced of the merits of free trade, then you are probably irredeemable. Left or Right doesn&#8217;t really enter the picture; Brad de Long, Paul Krugman, Milton Friedman and Richard Epstein all agreed that trade is most<br />
beneficial when as unfettered as possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
